Bottom Line / Tools
A2X vs ConnectBooks: how to actually choose
This comes up on almost every intro call. Ben has closed books for a multi-channel DTC brand — Controller at JoyJolt, selling on Amazon, Shopify, and 15+ channels with GoFlow as the OMS — so here's the honest version: both tools solve the same core problem, and the right answer depends on which question your books can't currently answer.
No affiliate pitch, no scorecard. Features and pricing change; check each vendor's site before you buy. What follows is the decision framework we use with clients.
The short version
A2X is accounting-first. Its strength is producing clean, summarized settlement entries that reconcile neatly to each payout, channel by channel. If your goal is books that tie out and a gross margin you trust, that's a very direct path.
ConnectBooks pushes further into inventory and product-level visibility inside the accounting file. If you want to interrogate profitability at a finer grain without leaving the books, that's the appeal.
Both are a large upgrade over coding the deposit to sales. Neither one will save you from an unreconciled clearing account, and neither one invents landed cost you haven't maintained.
Six questions before you commit
What problem is it solving for you?
Both tools exist so marketplace activity stops arriving as one net deposit. If your immediate problem is that revenue and fees are invisible, a summarized settlement approach fixes it fast. If your problem is that you can't see which SKU is profitable, you need granularity — in the tool or in an inventory system feeding it.
How much detail do you want in the ledger?
There's a real trade-off. Summary entries keep the accounting file small, fast, and easy to reconcile to payouts. Order- or SKU-level detail answers more questions inside the books but makes the file heavier and reconciliation more involved. Neither is wrong; pick the one that matches how you'll use it.
Who is going to reconcile it every month?
Whichever tool you choose, someone has to prove the clearing account clears and the deposit matches. Choose the tool the person doing that work can actually operate. A more powerful tool nobody reconciles is worse than a simpler one someone does.
How many channels are you running?
One marketplace is easy either way. Multi-channel is where consistency matters — the same treatment of fees, refunds, and cutoffs across every channel, so blended margin means something.
Where does inventory really live?
If you run an OMS or inventory platform as the source of truth for unit movement, the accounting tool's job shrinks to clean financial entries. If the accounting file is your only inventory record, lean toward the option that carries more product-level detail — or fix the inventory side first.
What does your accountant need at year-end?
A reconciliation trail from settlement to payout to bank, plus supportable inventory and COGS. Both tools can get you there. What sinks a year-end is an unreconciled clearing account, not the brand name on the integration.
What matters more than the tool
The brands with trustworthy ecommerce books aren't the ones who picked the perfect integration. They're the ones whose fee accounts are broken out, whose settlement periods are split at month-end, whose clearing account is proven before the close, and whose unit cost includes freight and duty. The tool automates the entry. The discipline produces the number.
If you want the mechanics behind that, we wrote them out step by step in reconciling Amazon settlements in QuickBooks. And if you'd rather someone just look at your current setup and tell you what they'd change, that's what the free books review is for.
FAQ
Questions about choosing a settlement tool
- Do I need A2X or ConnectBooks at all?
- If you sell on marketplaces at any real volume, yes — something has to translate settlements into accounting entries. Doing it by hand is possible for a single channel and a slow month, and it stops being possible the moment you add a second channel.
- What's the core difference between them?
- A2X is built around clean summarized settlement entries that reconcile to each payout — accounting-first. ConnectBooks leans further into inventory and SKU- or order-level visibility inside the accounting file. Both get you off coding deposits to sales; they optimize for different questions.
- Which one should a Shopify-heavy brand pick?
- Look at where your pain is. If the pain is "my payouts and my P&L don't agree," the settlement-summary approach solves it directly. If the pain is "I can't see margin by SKU," you want the more granular option — or a proper inventory system feeding the books.
- Will either tool fix my COGS?
- Not on its own. Neither tool knows your inbound freight, duty, or handling unless that cost data is maintained somewhere. True landed cost comes from your purchasing records and how it's capitalized into unit cost — the tool just carries the number it's given.
- Can we switch later?
- Yes, and it's a normal project. The work is mapping accounts, choosing a clean cutover date, and not re-importing a period twice. We'd rather you start with something and reconcile it well than stall on the decision for a quarter.
- What do you use with clients?
- Both, depending on the brand. We fit the tool to the business and the existing stack rather than forcing everyone onto one platform — and we'll tell you when your current setup is fine as-is.
Related: More from Bottom Line·Reconciling Amazon settlements in QuickBooks·The full stack we implement·Amazon seller bookkeeping·Shopify bookkeeping·Ecommerce bookkeeping services
Get a free books review.
Find out what's costing you.
Send your last month of books. We'll audit five key areas and send a 1-page findings report within 5 business days. No card, no pitch.